iporeo.blogg.se

Editready vs adobe
Editready vs adobe













  1. EDITREADY VS ADOBE HOW TO
  2. EDITREADY VS ADOBE FOR MAC
  3. EDITREADY VS ADOBE FULL
  4. EDITREADY VS ADOBE PRO

Here are my results as I encoded the clip into 3 different flavors of ProRes in both EditReady and Media Encoder:

EDITREADY VS ADOBE FULL

The original clip was full HD, and the original file size was 274MB. I used a single 57 second h.264 clip shot on my Canon 60D to conduct my test. However, once I started using EditReady (and comparing it to Adobe Media Encoder, which is what I normally use for all of my encoding), what I found was pretty impressive. It's just that clean and intuitive.Ĭoming into the conversion process, I had been expecting all of my tests to be painfully slow because, frankly, the Macbook is on its last leg.

EDITREADY VS ADOBE HOW TO

My guess is that literally anybody could figure out how to use it simply by looking at the interface. With the exception of another basic window that lets you add and edit metadata that can be accessed through the menu or a keyboard shortcut, that's all there is to the EditReady interface, and quite frankly that's a great thing. It's broken down into two distinct sections: one for adding and previewing media, and the other for manipulating the conversion settings. The interface, which is incredibly easy on the eyes, takes functional minimalism to a new level entirely. I also talked briefly with Mike Woodworth, the CEO of Divergent Media, who's also the lead developer of EditReady, and learned more about how the software was designed, what it can and cannot do, and where it is headed in the future.īefore we get to my thoughts about EditReady and the interview with Mike, here's a brief video introduction to the software.īased on the time that I have spent using EditReady over the past month, there are a few things that I really love about the software, and a few things that could be better. However, after reading about what sets EditReady apart from its competitors, then testing the app for myself, I'm ready to say that the claim is indeed a valid one.

editready vs adobe

In a market that is fairly saturated with transcoding solutions for filmmakers, that is definitely a bold claim, to say the least.

editready vs adobe

EDITREADY VS ADOBE PRO

ScopeBox monitors live video signals via a third party capture device, or direct from the timeline within Adobe Premiere Pro CC, and After Effects CC.Earlier in the summer, Divergent Media, a software company whose tools need no introduction in the video production world, released EditReady, a Mac transcoding app with a tremendous claim, that it was supposedly the world's fastest transcoder for Quicktime conversion. It recreates every major video quality assurance tool, including Preview Monitor, Waveform, Vectorscope, Audio Meter, Luminance Histogram, RGB Histogram, and RGB and YUV Parade. ScopeBox is an easy-to-use, low-cost application that transforms users’ Macs into a complete video analysis suite. Built for professional workflows and cameras formats, it sets the new standard for video transcoding performance and simplicity. Designed to be an integral tool for on-set, post-production and finishing workflows, EditReady helps you get from set to suite faster than ever.

EDITREADY VS ADOBE FOR MAC

Learn more: ScopelinkĮditReady is a transcoding application for Mac users. ScopeBox monitors live video signals via a third-party capture device, or direct from the timeline within Adobe Premiere Pro CC, Adobe After Effects CC.

editready vs adobe

ScopeLink is an Adobe transmit bundle and Quicktime component that allows you to feed video directly from Creative Cloud applications directly to ScopeBox. In business for over 10 years, we pride ourselves on making well-made tools for video professionals. Divergent Media is a San Francisco, CA based software company, providing flexible tools for video monitoring, acquisition, transcoding, and quality assurance.















Editready vs adobe